Students’ Willingness to Pay For Improved Accommodation Facilities: A Case of the College of Business Education, Tanzania.

Authors

  • J.W. Tumaini College of Business Education, Mbeya Campus

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26437.ajar.03.2022.12

Abstract

Purpose: This study explores the students’ Willingness to Pay (WTP) for improved accommodation facilities using the case of the College of Business Education (CBE) in Tanzania.

Design/Methodology/Approach: The Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) was used to estimate the value that the students attach to the accommodation facilities. A survey was conducted on the two campuses of Mbeya and Dodoma involving a sample of 348 students out of the total population of 3618 continuing students from the two campuses. An interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to elicit the information from the respondents.  In the analysis, the binary logistic regression was conducted to estimate the parameters for the students’ WTP for the accommodation facilities and then the parameter estimates were used to compute the mean students’ WTP.

Findings: The findings of the study showed that the significant determinants of the students’ WTP for accommodation facilities included age of the students, education level of the student, current accommodation of the student, students’ preference for accommodation, income of the students and the campus dummy (Mbeya campus).

Research Limitations: The study findings are limited by the fact that its scope included only one higher learning institution. The inclusion of more than one higher learning institution could yield a sounder conclusion. Besides this, the study is also limited by the ability of the applied methodology (CVM) in measuring WTP. Future studies can consider using other stated preference approaches like the Choice Experiment Method or a revealed preference method like the Hedonic Pricing Method.

Practical Implications: The findings of this study will be useful to decision-makers in higher learning institutions when allocating resources for improving accommodation facilities for the students. The study therefore first recommends that the determinants of the students’ valuation of the accommodation facilities should be considered when allocating accommodation facilities to the students in higher learning institutions. Secondly, higher learning institutions should attach equivalent value to the students’ accommodation facilities by improving the facilities to meet the needs of the students.

Social Implications: Students at CBE attach higher values to the accommodation facilities than the value attached to the services by the College. It also sends a signal that for the campus with no in campus hostels, the need for accommodation facilities is more pressing and thus receives a higher value (WTP).

Originality / Value: This study has contributed to the pool of knowledge in this area as it has unveiled the students’ valuation of (WTP for) accommodation facilities in higher learning institutions, especially in Tanzania where there are scanty works of literature on the same area.

References

Accardo, A. L., Kuder, S. J., & Woodruff, J. (2019). Accommodations and support services preferred by college students with autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 23(3), 574–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361318760490

Ashley, R., Gersonius, B., Digman, C., Horton, B., Smith, B., & Shaffer, P. (2018). Including uncertainty in valuing blue and green infrastructure for stormwater management. Ecosystem Services, 33(November 2017), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.08.011

Bland, B., & Charity, S. A. (2018). It ’ s All About The Money : The Influence Of Family Estrangement , Accommodation Struggles and Homelessness On Student Success in UK Higher Education Introduction : Estranged students in UK higher education, 20(3), 68–89.

Card, P., & Thomas, H. (2018). Student housing as a learning space. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42(4), 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2018.1514489

Devi, V., Binti Mohamad Ashari, S. N., Binti Abd Rashid, S., Bin NurAdlan, M. A., & Bin Mohamed Musadiq, M. M. (2016). Cost, Benefit and Risks Associated with in-Campus and off-Campus Accommodations of Medical Students: A cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Sciences, 4(3), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijpcs.4.3.5

Gopal, N., & van Niekerk, C. (2018). Safety in student residences matters! South African Journal of Higher Education, 32(3), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.20853/32-3-2524

Hsu, K. (2020). House Prices in the Peripheries of Mass Rapid Transit Stations Using the Contingent Valuation Method. Sustainability, 8701(12), 8–12.

Khan, R. A. J., Thaheem, M. J., & Ali, T. H. (2020). Are Pakistani homebuyers ready to adopt sustainable housing? An insight into their willingness to pay. Energy Policy, 143(May), 111598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111598

Lee, S. Y., & Yoo, S. E. (2019). Willingness to pay for accessible elderly housing in Korea. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 24(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2019.11095

Magambo, L., Dida, M. A., & Kaijage, S. F. (2020). Towards an Online Portal for Locating Students ’ Private Rental Accommodation in Tanzania, 5(3).

Mallios, Z., Latinopoulos, D., & Latinopoulos, P. (2015). A contingent valuation method application for the valuation of the park of Thessaloniki International Fair. In Fifth International Conference on Environmental Management, Engineering, Planning & Economics (pp. 14–18).

Marshak, L., Van Wieren, T., Ferrell, D., Swiss, L., & Dugan, C. (2010). Exploring Barriers to College Student Use of Disability Services and Accommodations. The Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 22(3), 151–165.

Mulhearn, C., & Franco, M. (2018). If you build it will they come? The boom in purpose-built student accommodation in central Liverpool: Destudentification, studentification and the future of the city. Local Economy, 33(5), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094218792740

Mzileni, P., & Mkhize, N. (2019). Decolonisation as a Spatial Question: The Student Accommodation Crisis and Higher Education Transformation. South African Review of Sociology, 50(3–4), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/21528586.2020.1733649

Perman, R., Ma, Y., Mcgilvray, J., & Common, M. (2003). Natural Resource and Environmental Economics (3rd ed.). Edinburgh Gate Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Philip, A., Ileanwa, A. C., & El-hussain, A. M. (2018). Post-Occupancy Evaluation of Students Hostel Facilities in Federal Universities in North Central , Nigeria, (December). https://doi.org/10.5923/j.arch.20180804.02

Spio-Kwofie, A., Anyobodeh, R., & Abban, G. (2016). an Assessment of the Accommodation Challenges Faced By Students of Takoradi Polytechnic, 3(1), 64–72.

Verhetsel, A., Kessels, R., Zijlstra, T., & Van Bavel, M. (2017). Housing preferences among students: collective housing versus individual accommodations? A stated preference study in Antwerp (Belgium). Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 32(3), 449–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-016-9522-5

Zhang, L., Chen, L., Wu, Z., Xue, H., & Dong, W. (2018). Key factors affecting informed consumers’ willingness to pay for green housing: A case study of Jinan, China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(6), 7–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061711

Downloads

Published

2022-04-04

How to Cite

Tumaini, J. (2022). Students’ Willingness to Pay For Improved Accommodation Facilities: A Case of the College of Business Education, Tanzania. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH, 8(1), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.26437.ajar.03.2022.12