Determinants of The Special Groups Participation in Government Procurement Opportunity in Tanzania.

Authors

  • A.K. Tesha Mwenge Catholic University; Moshi, Tanzania.
  • P.M. Nsimbila Mzumbe University, Morogoro, Tanzania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26437.ajar.03.2022.15

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the key determinants influencing special groups' participation in government procurement opportunities in Tanzania. The benefits that special groups participate in the government procurement opportunity have to offer in terms of enhancing Tanzanian government efficiency in eradicating poverty and reducing the unemployment rate, mean that we should act to surmount existing challenges.

Design/ Methodology/ Approach: A study involved a mixed research approach involving both quantitative and qualitative. The Snowball sampling technique was used to select 100 respondents as a sample size, of these, 94 responded to the questionnaire. However, data were collected through questionnaires and an interviews guide.

Findings: The result showed that information factors, financial factors and regulatory factors had significant effects on the special groups' involvement in the government procurement opportunity with P-values p=0.029, 0.014, 0.012 respectively, while Technical factors and ethical factors had no significant effects on special group participation in the government procurement opportunity with P-value p=0.055 and p=0.190 respectfully. Perceptions of not winning by the special groups, and inferiority among special groups individually and collectively, however, hinder the involvement in the government procurement market.

Research Limitations: on the determinants of special groups' participation in the public procurement opportunity. Minority groups were included as new variables.

Practical Implication: The result of this study will be beneficial to the top governance, mutually at nationwide and organization levels in Tanzania, of the advantage that may accumulate from the full participation of the special groups in the Public procurements market. Social  Implication: The Tanzania Procurement policy for special groups should promote subcontracting, funding mechanisms and teaming for special groups to participate in the government procurement opportunity.

Originality/ Value: Perceptions of not winning by the special groups, and inferiority among special groups individually and collectively hinder participation in procurement opportunities.

Author Biographies

A.K. Tesha, Mwenge Catholic University; Moshi, Tanzania.

Ambrose Karoli Tesha is an  Assistant Lecturer Department of Economic and Business Studies, Mwenge Catholic University, Moshi, Tanzania.

P.M. Nsimbila, Mzumbe University, Morogoro, Tanzania

Dr Paul Maganga Nsimbila is a Lecturer in the Department of Procurement and Logistics Management, School of Business,  Mzumbe University, Morogoro, Tanzania.

References

Akenroye, T. O., & Aju, O. (2013). Barriers to SMEs' participation in public procurement in

Nigeria: Some preliminary results. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 17(4-6), 314-328.

Amaechi, E. (2016). Exploring barriers to women entrepreneurs in Enugu State, Nigeria

(Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).

Aziz, R. B. H. A. (2016). The effectiveness of public service complaint management

processes in contexts of autocratic governance: the case of Brunei Darussalam (Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham).

Badaso, C. J. (2014). Challenges of implementing procurement policies in state corporations

in Kenya. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(3), 56-61.

Bakker, E., Walker, H., & Harland, C. (2006). Organizing for collaborative procurement: An

initial conceptual framework. Advancing public procurement: Practices, innovation and knowledge-sharing, 14-44.

Basheka, B. C. (2017). A Framework for understanding the barriers to effective participation

of WOBs in Public Procurement in Uganda. Kampala: Unpublished Document.

Bolton, P. (2016). Public procurement as a tool to drive innovation in South Africa.

Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad, 19(1).

Cheema, G. S. (2005). Building democratic institutions: governance reform in developing countries. Kumarian Press.

Chepkangor, S. C., & Lubale, G. (2016) Journal Homepage:-www. journalijar. com.

Retrieved August 17, 2020

Common Wealth (2010). Improving SMEs Access to the Public Procurement Market in

Uganda. Draft report. (SASD/EAS/UGA/045). October 2010. [Online] Available:www. ppda.go.ug/.../reports/.../347-improving-sme-access-to-procure [Assessed August 22, 2020].

Dempsey, N., Burton, M., & Selin, J. (2016). Contracting out parks and roads maintenance in

England. International Journal of Public Sector Management.

Dintwa, K. F. (2012). Economic status, education and risky sexual behaviour for urban

Botswana women. Journal of International Women's Studies, 13(3), 153-170.

Emily, W. (2017). Factors Influencing Uptake of Government Procurement Opportunities by Vulnerable Groups in Kenyan County Governments: (A Case Study of Laikipia County Government. Journal of Business and Management 6(12), 32-40.

Fan, C. S., Lin, C., & Treisman, D. (2009). Political decentralization and corruption: Evidence from around the world. Journal of Public Economics, 93(1-2), 14-34.

FreshMinds. (2008). Evaluating SME experiences of government procurement. Scorecard Working Party, Fresh Minds, London.

Halams, K. K. (2014). Failure of Small-Scale business in Nigeria. Northcentral University

Hirsch, S. J., & Hollender, M. H. (1969). Hysterical psychosis: clarification of the concept. American Journal of Psychiatry, 125(7), 909-915.

Johnson G. N. D., & Simba, F. T. (2015) Factors Affecting Access to Government

Procurement Opportunities for Disadvantaged Groups in Public Entities:(A Case Study of Kenya Ports Authority). International Journal of Science and Research, 2319-7064.

Kalubanga, M., & Kakwezi, P. (2013). Value for money auditing and audit evidence from a procurement perspective-A conceptual paper. International Journal of Advances in Management and Economics, 2(5), 115-124.

Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling: Guilford

publications.

Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International.

Lagat, M. K., Namusonge, G., & Berut, Z. (2016). Factors Affecting Youths, Women and Persons with Disabilities in Accessing Procurement Opportunities in Transnzoia County Government. International Journal of Recent Research in Commerce Economics and Management, 3(2), 42-66.

Leticia, M. L. (2018). Women Participation in public procurement: the role of international fora and transnational networks., Crossing Borders: Re-mapping Women’s Movements at the Turn of the 21st Century, 205-20.

Lucas, L. (2017). An enquiry into gender mainstreaming in local councils in Arusha city and Meru district council in Tanzania (Doctoral dissertation, University of Dar es Salaam).

Maheshwari, P., Gokhale, A., Seth, P., Agarwal, N., & Makena, A. (2020). Mainstreaming GLI: an assessment of women owned enterprises in developing countries.

Makena, S. M. (2016). Factors Influencing Women Participation in Government Procurement: A Case of Nyeri Central Sub-county, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi).

Mamiro, R., G., (2017). Value for money: The limping pillar in public procurement-experience from Tanzania.,In 4th International Public Procurement Conference.,

McCrudden, C. (2004, November). Using public procurement to achieve social outcomes. In Natural resources forum 28(4), 257-267.

McCrudden, C. (2007). Buying social justice: Equality, government procurement, & legal change. OUP Oxford.

Meyer, D. F. (2018). Predictors of good governance and effective government management: the case of Poland. Polish Journal of Management Studies.4(3) 192-194.

Mrope, N. P., Gregory, P., & Namusonge, S. (2017). Private Sector Involvement in Government procurement opportunity: An Assessment of the Extent and Effect in Tanzanian Public Entities. European Journal of Business and Management 9(8), 105-112.

Mrope, N. P., Namusonge, G. S., & Iravo, M. A. (2017). Does compliance with rules ensure

better performance? An assessment of the effect of compliance with procurement legal and regulatory framework on the performance of public procurement in Tanzania. European Journal of Logistics, Purchasing and Supply Chain Management, 5(1), 40-50.

Mwangi, P. N. (2017). Determinants of compliance with access to government procurement opportunities regulations for special groups by public universities in Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, JKUAT).

Njeri, W. C., & Getuno, P. (2016). Determinants for youth access to government procurement opportunities in Kenya: A case of Judiciary. International Journal of Innovative Social Sciences & Humanities Research, 4(3), 31-49.

Odhiambo, W., & Kamau, P. (2003). Public procurement: lessons from Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda.

Okeahalam, C. C. (2004). Corporate governance and disclosure in Africa: Issues and challenges. Journal of Financial Regulation and compliance.

Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Routledge.

Peprah, J. A., Mensah, A. O., & Akosah, N. B. (2016). Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) accessibility to public procurement: SMEs entity perspective in Ghana. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 4(11), 25-40.

PPRA, (2017) Participation of Special Groups in Public Procurement

Public Procurement Act, (2011)., (PPA 2011, CAP 410)., Dar es Salaam Government Printer.

Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5), 481-498. Boston, MA: Pearson

Tukamuhabwa, B. R. (2012). Antecedents and consequences of public procurement non- compliance behaviour. Journal of Economics and Behavioural Studies, 4(1), 34-46.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-06

How to Cite

Tesha, A., & Nsimbila, P. (2022). Determinants of The Special Groups Participation in Government Procurement Opportunity in Tanzania. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH, 8(1), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.26437.ajar.03.2022.15