Gender Gap in Asset Ownership: Tanzania State of Play.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26437/ajar.03.2022.23Keywords:
asset ownership; customary norms; gender gap; TanzaniaAbstract
Purpose: This study, examined the gender gap that still exists in asset ownership and its associated factors.
Methodology/Approach: This study employs an integrative review to provide a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon under study. The purpose of this review is to establish whether findings are consistent and generalizable across different settings in Tanzania or whether they vary significantly by particular subgroups. All studies that were fit to be included were summarised and patterns of information collected were tabulated, itemised and discussed in a systematic review. Seven (07) current papers (2017-2021) related to the study were reviewed to establish factors attributed to the gender gap in asset ownership.
Findings: The findings show that there still exists a gender gap in asset ownership in Tanzania. Using Land as a measure of asset ownership the following factors are the source of the gender-based ownership gap; lack of knowledge and awareness Lack of income and Traditions and customary norms are the most critical factors limiting women from owning assets in Tanzania. Other factors include ineffective implementation of the existing land laws and regulations and symbolic violence.
Research Limitations: Further studies can be done by broadening the scope. This can be through clustering studies done in urban and rural areas to determine any locality factors attributing to the gender asset ownership gap.
Practical Implications: The findings from this study are useful to various groups. The government can use the findings to reduce the gender gap in asset ownership by addressing key factors identified. This will help them stay more focused on the most critical factors. Further, NGOs and the society at large can utilize the findings in creating awareness campaigns regarding women's asset ownership.
Value: the findings of this study provide a better understanding of the key factors that limit women from owning assets as it integrates findings of different studies at different times.
References
Battaile, W. G. (2020). What does Tanzania’s move to lower-middle-income status mean? Africa
Can End Poverty blog, 5.
Dilli, S. (2017). The deep causes of economic development: family systems and female agency.
In Agency, Gender, and Economic Development in the World Economy 1850–2000 (pp. 138-161). Routledge.
Elson, D., & Seth, A. (Eds.). (2019). Gender equality and inclusive growth: Economic policies to
achieve sustainable development. UN Women.
Harper-Shipman, T. D. (2019). Rethinking ownership of development in Africa. Routledge.
Idris, I. (2018). Barriers to women’s economic inclusion in Tanzania.
Khan, O. (2009). Why Do Assets Matter? Assets Equality and Ethnicity: Building Towards
Financial Inclusion.
Kongela, S. M. (2020). Gender Equality in Ownership of Agricultural Land in Rural Tanzania:
Does Matrilineal Tenure System Matter? African Journal on Land Policy and Geospatial Sciences, 3(4), 13-27.
Lusasi, J., & Mwaseba, D. (2020). Gender inequality and symbolic violence in women’s access
to family land in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania. Land, 9(11), 468.
Makota, N. N. (2018). Impact of land regularization on empowerment of women in developing
countries: A case of urban informal settlements in Tanzania (Doctoral dissertation, The Open University of Tanzania).
Melesse, T. M., & Awel, Y. M. (2020). Land Tenure, Gender, and Productivity in Ethiopia and
Tanzania. In Women and Sustainable Human Development (pp. 89-108). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Mhango, S., Malima, R., & Lukumay, E. Z. (2014). Gender equality in land ownership as a strategy
for poverty reduction in Tanzania: A case of Ilala Municipal in Dar Es Salaam City. Developing Country Studies, 4(10), 73-78.
Moyo, K. (2017). Women's Access to Land in Tanzania: The Case of the Makete District (Doctoral
dissertation, Kungliga Tekniska högskolan).
Najjar, D., Baruah, B., & El Garhi, A. (2020). Gender and Asset Ownership in the Old and New
Lands of Egypt. Feminist Economics, 26(3), 119-143.
O'Sullivan, M. (2017). Gender and property rights in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review of constraints
and effective interventions. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (8250).
Panda, P., & Agarwal, B. (2005). Marital violence, human development and women’s property
status in India. World Development, 33(5), 823-850.
Peluso, N. L., & Ribot, J. (2020). Postscript: A theory of access revisited.
Penchansky, R., & Thomas, J. W. (1981). The concept of access: definition and relationship to
consumer satisfaction. Medical care, 127-140.
Ribot, J. C., & Peluso, N. L. (2003). A theory of access. Rural sociology, 68(2), 153-181.
Saurman, E. (2016). Improving access: modifying Penchansky and Thomas’s theory of access.
Journal of health services research & policy, 21(1), 36-39.
Vyas, S., & Jansen, H. A. (2018). Unequal power relations and partner violence against women
in Tanzania: a cross-sectional analysis. BMC women's health, 18(1), 1-12.
Wineman, A., & Liverpool-Tasie, L. S. O. (2017). Land markets and land access among female-
headed households in northwestern Tanzania. World Development, 100, 108-122.
Zulfiqar, G. (2017). Financializing the poor:‘dead capital’, women’s gold and microfinance in
Pakistan. Economy and Society, 46(3-4), 476-498.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 AFRICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCHBy submitting and publishing your articles in the African Journal of Applied Research, you agree to transfer the copyright of the Article from the authors to the Journal ( African Journal of Applied Research).
