Kaizen Approach to Quality Improvement and its Financial Implication

Authors

  • B. Mwenda College of Business Education, Mbeya Tanzania.
  • L. Gasper College of Business Education, Dodoma Tanzania.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26437/ajar.31.10.2022.28

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the impact of kaizen practice and how it affects the quality of large manufacturing firms particularly, Kilimanjaro international leather company.

Design/methodology/approach. In this study, the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle technique was employed to lower the production process's defect rate. The fishbone served as a tool for support. The PDCA cycle and fishbone are two top-notch techniques that aid in reducing the number of defective parts.

Findings: The defect rate decreased by 2%. Improvement in the production process was achieved.

Research limitation: One large manufacturing industry is insufficient to generalize the study's primary results. This will be achieved in the future by doing additional investigations in several large manufacturing firms.

Practical implication: This study will provide consultants and practitioners with a valuable understanding of how Kaizen improves the financial performance of large manufacturing industries in Tanzania.

Social Implications: The majority of learning exercises carried out during kaizen projects seek to enhance social outcomes in terms of staff members' problem-solving skills and attitudes. Particularly, Kaizen coordinators are concerned with group members' understanding of continuous improvement as well as their communication and problem-solving abilities.

Originality/Value: Although some studies on kaizen have been conducted, it is currently discovered that there is insufficient literature on the application and impact of the kaizen concept in large manufacturing enterprises. Based on this case study, the framework of kaizen philosophy practices is offering useful insights for leather companies, other manufacturing industries, and organizations, including the Tanzania Kaizen unit, practitioners, and academicians.

Author Biographies

B. Mwenda, College of Business Education, Mbeya Tanzania.

He is a Lecturer at the  Department of Accountancy,  College of Business Education, Mbeya-Tanzania.

L. Gasper, College of Business Education, Dodoma Tanzania.

He is an Assistant Lecturer at the Department of Mathematics and ICT, College of Business Education, Dodoma-Tanzania.

References

Agrahari, R. S., Dangle, P. A., & Chandratre, K. V. (2015). Implementation of 5S Methodology In The Small Scale Industry: A Case Study. 4(04), 8.

Alaaraj, H., & Bakri, A. (2019). The Effect of Lean Manufacturing on the Financial Performance: Case of the Manufacturing Companies in South Lebanon. Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies, 5(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.26710/jbsee.v5i2.794

Alamri, W. A. (2019). Effectiveness of Qualitative Research Methods: Interviews and Diaries. International Journal of English and Cultural Studies, 2(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijecs.v2i1.4302

Antony, J., Snee, R., & Hoerl, R. (2017). Lean Six Sigma: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 34(7), 1073–1093. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-03-2016-0035

Ciesielska, M., Boström, K. W., & Öhlander, M. (2018). Observation Methods. In M. Ciesielska & D. Jemielniak (Eds.), Qualitative Methodologies in Organization Studies (pp. 33–52). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65442-3_2

Kapuria, T. K., Rahman, M., & Haldar, S. (2017). Root Cause Analysis and Productivity Improvement of An Apparel Industry in Bangladesh Through Kaizen Implementation. Journal of Applied Research on Industrial Engineering, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.22105/jarie.2017.108637.1025

Kumar, R. (2019). Kaizen a Tool for Continuous Quality Improvement in Indian Manufacturing Organization. International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences, 4(2), 452–459. https://doi.org/10.33889/IJMEMS.2019.4.2-037

Kumar, R. (2021). Kaizen a Tool for Continuous Quality Improvement in Indian Manufacturing Kaizen a Tool for Continuous Quality Improvement in Indian Manufacturing Organization. April 2019. https://doi.org/10.33889/IJMEMS.2019.4.2-037

Leksic, I., Stefanic, N., & Veza, I. (2020). The impact of using different lean manufacturing tools on waste reduction. Advances in Production Engineering & Management, 15(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2020.1.351

Maarof, M. G., & Mahmud, F. (2016). A Review of Contributing Factors and Challenges in Implementing Kaizen in Small and Medium Enterprises. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 522–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00065-4

Mellat, M., & Safari, A. (2022). International Journal of Production Economics Enhancing the quality and competitiveness of small businesses: A pooled cross-sectional analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 246(January), 108410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108410

MIT, & JICA. (2020). Framework for Quality and Productivity Improvement (KAIZEN) in Manufacturing Sector 2020-2030.

Moen, R., & Norman, C. (n.d.). Evolution of the PDCA Cycle. 11.

Nithia, K. K., Noordin, M. Y., & Saman, M. Z. M. (2015). Lean Production Weaknesses in Manufacturing Industry: A Review. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 735, 344–348. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.735.344

Powell, T., & Sammut-Bonnici, T. (2015). Pareto analysis. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Wiley Encyclopedia of Management (pp. 1–2). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118785317.weom120202

Realyvásquez-Vargas, A., Arredondo-Soto, K. C., Carrillo-Gutiérrez, T., & Ravelo, G. (2018).

Applying the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle to reduce the defects in the manufacturing industry. A case study. Applied Sciences, 8(11), 2181.

Rewers, P., Trojanowska, J., Chabowski, P., & Żywicki, K. (2016). Impact Of Kaizen Solutions on Production Efficiency. Modern Management Review. https://doi.org/10.7862/rz.2016.mmr.53

Rosak-Szyrocka, J. (2019). Quality of Life Improvement in Kaizen Aspect. Quality Production Improvement - QPI, 1(1), 528–536. https://doi.org/10.2478/cqpi-2019-0071

Shan, A. W., Ahmad, M. F., & Nor, N. H. M. (2016). The Mediating Effect of Kaizen between Total Quality Management (TQM) and Business Performance. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 160, 012012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/160/1/012012

Shrivastava, S., & Jain, H. (2018). Review Paper on “Productivity Improvement using Kaizen—MUDA Elimination.” 9(5), 4.

Takahashi, A. R. W., & Araujo, L. (2019). Case study research: Opening up research opportunities. RAUSP Management Journal, 55(1), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-05-2019-0109

Widdowson, M. (2011). Case Study Research Methodology. International Journal of Transactional Analysis Research & Practice, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.29044/v2i1p25

Downloads

Published

2022-11-21

How to Cite

Mwenda, B., & Gasper, L. (2022). Kaizen Approach to Quality Improvement and its Financial Implication. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH, 8(2), 394–405. https://doi.org/10.26437/ajar.31.10.2022.28